Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Indirect Faith

I am a fan of Calvin's writings. Though I am not a Calvinist myself, I am drawn to his style and the way he subtly zeros in on the spiritual truth. He is a much stronger writer than many who consider him to be an ally.

Although Calvin is making doctrinal points in this passage, he is not without attention to the task of edification. Consider the following passage:


We grant, indeed, that so long as we are pilgrims in the world faith is implicit, not only because as yet many things are hidden from us, but because, involved in the mists of error, we attain not to all.

The highest wisdom, even of him who has attained the greatest perfection, is to go forward, and endeavour in a calm and teachable spirit to make further progress. Hence Paul exhorts believers to wait for further illumination in any matter in which they differ from each other (Phil. 3:15). And certainly experience teaches, that so long as we are in the flesh our attainments are less than is to be desired.

In our daily reading we fall in with many obscure passages which convict us of ignorance. With this curb God keeps us modest, assigning to each a measure of faith, that every teacher, however excellent, may still be disposed to learn. Striking examples of this implicit faith may be observed in the disciples of Christ before they were fully illuminated.

We see with what difficulty they take in the first rudiments, how they hesitate in the minutest matters, how, though hanging on the lips of their Master, they make no great progress; nay, even after running to the sepulchre on the report of the women, the ressurection of their Master appears to them a dream.

As Christ previously bore testimony to their faith, we cannot say that they were altogether devoid of it; nay, had they not been persuaded that Christ would rise again, all their zeal would have been extinguished. Nor was it superstition that led the women to prepare spices to embalm a dead body of whose revivial they had no expectation; but although they gave credit to the words of one whom they knew to be true, yet the ignorance which still possessed their minds involved their faith in darkness, and left them in amazement.

Hence they are said to have believed only when, by the reality, they perceive the truth of what Christ had spoken, and not that they then began to believe, but the seed of a hidden faith, which lay as it were dead in their hearts, then burst forth in vigour.

They had, therefore, a true but implicit faith, having reverently embraced Christ as the only teacher. Then, being taught by him, they felt assured that he was the author of salvation: in fine, believed that he had come from heaven to gather disciples, and take them thither through the grace of the Father. There cannot be a more familiar proof of this, than that in all men faith is always mingled with incredulity.

The Institutes. Book III. Chapter II.


Here are some aspects of this passage that caught my attention.

First, Calvin writes: "In our daily reading we fall in with many obscure passages which convict us of ignorance." A key phrase here is "fall in". This phrase accurately expresses the gravity of the word and how it desires to pull us into it. Calvin is telling us the Bible should be read daily and we should pay attention to the way it intends to speak to us personally. An honest heart reads the Bible saying, "Hey, that sounds like my life."

This is in direct contrast to his opponents, the scholastics, who held the Bible at arm's length. They did this so they could pass it around easily in the form of rhetoric and ideas without needing to bother with the details of examining how to relate to it. They made it easy to look down on the disciples for their shortcomings while forgetting their own.

Second, consider this enigmatic sentence: "... Faith is implicit, not only because as yet many things are hidden from us, but because, involved in the mists of error, we attain not to all."

The word implicit means 'implied' or 'indirectly expressed'. When Calvin calls faith 'implicit' he means that it doesn't happen as a direct result of outward events. It is rather an inward thing that we cannot see in another person directly.

Calvin asks, 'Why doesn't faith happen directly? Well it's not just because we don't know everything. It's also because we live by pathetic expectations.'

Jesus explicitly told the disciples he would be handed over to sinners and die and he would later be brought back to life again. When Jesus died (and even as early as his capture) the disciples seemed to give up on Christianity.

What's important here is Calvin isn't shaking his head saying, "Those selfish turkeys." And he's not saying, "If only they had been more educated like those scholastics ...". He's saying, "Those guys had trouble accepting the beautiful message of the gospel ... just like all of us."

Thirdly Calvin notes at the end of the chapter: "In all men faith is always mingled with incredulity."

In other words Calvin is saying, 'Show me a person who faithfully trusts God and I will show you an unfaithful person living with doubt.' Faith is not a trite thing to be easily won over. As one Danish writer once put it, it is not a thing easy to gain and surpass but a task for a lifetime.

In conclusion -and I do believe Calvin is with me on this one- the command to have faith is so foreign, so alien to our human understanding that we need God to come into our hearts and win us over to the life of faith. Although I do not believe God forces His faith upon us, it is something we need to be on board with Him about.

Also faith is not something we can 'show off' and boast about. No one else really knows how much faith we have (and how much we don't have) except God. So we should strive to trust God in the way that is pleasing to him and to often examine our hearts.


Labels: ,


10 Comments:

Blogger SocietyVs said...

I am not a big fan of Calvin - but this passage of his makes tonnes of sense and I actually liked it.

I like how he frames the story and puts any believer on an even kiel - whether this era or that era - faith is still the same thing. I appreciate that viewpoint - since I have seen a lot of that from reading the scritpures also.

I find faith to be such a huge part of life - but faith in God to be one part of life that is negelected until a time later on. I think a lot of people don;t go down this route for a variety of reasons and it's too bad. I find this faith absolutely beutifying.

Wednesday, 07 March, 2007  
Blogger Soul Food Dude said...

A wonderful passage. Thanks for sharing.

Wednesday, 07 March, 2007  
Blogger Soul Food Dude said...

BB said: "I think there is a connection between 'justifies' and epistemology. When the Bible says God is the one who justifies perhaps it is repeating Solomon's admonition to 'lean not on your own understanding...'. Something to consider."

Ahhhhh, I have that verse on my wall! I love lots of quotes from the NT, but nothing from it strikes quite as deeply as that simple phrase. And yet, if I did not have Jesus to start from, I don't think I would ever appreciate that verse as much as I do! It's as if it was waiting for its great expression in Jesus and his apostles.

I think you're onto something in making that connection. Especially in light of the words that follow the verse... "In all your ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct your path." Those are sweet words.

Wednesday, 07 March, 2007  
Blogger Soul Food Dude said...

Sorry, BB! Yes, I also love Batman. He has been my favorite super hero for most of my upbringing. Ghostrider was for a brief time, and Spiderman enjoyed a longer period as the cool hero, but I always came back to Batman.

The animated series was one of my favorite cartoons, although I think I liked X-Men more as far as cartoons went. I loved the most recent Batman movie. There's something about his character that really makes him great. His character makes him a hero. His character is the reason for the cape and cowl, for his expertise, for his determination, for his whole lifestyle. The simple idea of a mere man choosing to become more than a mere man... now that's cool. Also, the theme of striking terror into the hearts of the wicked always appealed to me. Justice, I guess. Isn't that Batman's drive at bottom? Even his scary getup is about justice. Dude, I could talk about Batman forever.

Ever wish that a fictional character would be brought to life at the resurrection to live with God? I have. I kinda hope Batman will be in the new earth. We'll see.

Friday, 09 March, 2007  
Blogger Micah Hoover said...

I apologize for my unresponsiveness. I expect to reply sooner in the coming days.

"I like how he frames the story and puts any believer on an even kiel - whether this era or that era - faith is still the same thing." SocietyVS

Good point. I am tired of the way preachers find heroes in the Bible and then make it sound like it is easy to follow them. "We have Abraham as our father...". To walk as the believers walked we must acknowledge that their temptations back then look a lot like our temptations today -and their failures look a lot like our failures.

To understand the faith of those who came before one must become contemporaneous with them. This is a state in which our accidental differences are minimized. Faith is -as you say, Jason- no different from era to era. When it comes to the task of discipleship we have no advantage in coming twenty centuries later.

Tuesday, 13 March, 2007  
Blogger Micah Hoover said...

"His character is the reason for the cape and cowl, for his expertise, for his determination, for his whole lifestyle." SoulFoodDude

Yes. Unlike the hoards of Gotham citizens driven by their desires for things outside them, Batman is driven by something very inward.

"The simple idea of a mere man choosing to become more than a mere man... now that's cool." SFD

If Bruce Wayne's metamorphosis into something trans-human means he becomes an "idea" then I find the Batman Begins quote a horrible departure from the spirit of Batman. On the other hand if by becoming more than "a mere man" (that is to say more than a 'kind of thing') he gains a self, then I am in agreement.

"Also, the theme of striking terror into the hearts of the wicked always appealed to me. Justice, I guess. Isn't that Batman's drive at bottom? Even his scary getup is about justice." SFD

I agree here. This drive is not easy to appreciate or often celebrated. The difficulty, hardship, and sorrow of the task are commensurate with its greatness. So many villians and so few Batmen ...

In some ways I think "Justice" as his drive could be substituted for resignation. You know what they say of resignation: that it is like the fabled garment which is designed in tears, threaded in tears, and worn in tears, but in the end it is an armor stronger than the firmest irons.

Catwoman prowls the night in search of jewlery and feline welfare. Her style is of desperation because she cannot accept her life without those jewls or without the safety of cats.

Batman is different. He recognizes his attraction to Selina Kyle but is also willing to resign those desires -even to the point of apprehending her and handing her over to the police. The public will always find this kind of love hard to understand, and, indeed, Batman struggles with it. But then this is why Batman is great and why we are all slaves to sin.

Thanks for stopping by SFD.

Tuesday, 13 March, 2007  
Blogger Soul Food Dude said...

Nah, I didn't mean "idea" by "more than a mere man." I did, however, find that quote in the movie refreshing. To me there was something ringing true to Batman about it, but it also struck me as a departure, as you said.

What I meant was something more like what you said... a self. In a way, the mask is not really a mask, but a revealing of his true face... or at least one of his true faces. What I love about Batman is that he IS Batman... Bruce Wayne is just his alter ego. This is unlike Spiderman, who is clearly primarily Peter Parker. I don't think any of the Batman movies have done this element of Batman quite right... I think the 80's Batman with Joker came the closest. But hey, when it comes to Batman, I think I actually know little about the comics. I've read a good few dozen, and I've read a Batman Knightfall novel, but I'm open to the possibility that I don't know this Batman that well. When I think of Batman, I primarily think of the Animated Series Batman and the 80's Tim Burton Batman combined. Gosh, I loved that cartoon.

As for the resignation thing, I see what you're saying. I can't see resignation as THE drive, per se, but I can definitely see that his is a life of consistent resignation, and that this choice has been made and maintained for justice.

Sure is a fascinating dude for a fictional character. Ever seen "V for Vendetta"? V is not Batman, but I do find interesting similarities. For me, V is just as fascinating a character as Batman, not because he's similar to Batman, but because he's V. Another character whose mask is his real face... which I think is almost a quote in the movie.

Batman talk is fun!

Tuesday, 13 March, 2007  
Blogger Micah Hoover said...

SFD:

I posted a reply yesterday and blogger ate it =( Sorry!

Saturday, 17 March, 2007  
Blogger Micah Hoover said...

"When I think of Batman, I primarily think of the Animated Series Batman and the 80's Tim Burton Batman combined. Gosh, I loved that cartoon." SoulFoodDude

Me too. The two were closely related. The comic book series have just gone off in too many directions. And I don't think they put enough focus on the choices and style of the characters.

"Ever seen 'V for Vendetta'? V is not Batman, but I do find interesting similarities." SoulFoodDude

Glad you were able to enjoy that one. I had high, high expectations for the movie as I strongly enjoyed the matrix but it felt like the movie was saying, "Vote in favor of our political views and you will have meaning in life." Political opinions can't give a person meaning in life.

A few other criticisms: I don't think the government should obey the so-called public. The individuals should obey the government. Associating a sitting president with Adolf Hitler is outrageous -especially our current one. The defense of the Koran on esthetic grounds is totally alien to the intention of the Koran. And I had a couple problems with the mask too: it seemed like he was always saying, "I'm so clever and witty but I need this mask to tell you the audience because you're incapable of recognizing that."

It seems you are right about the extent of your interest in superheros as I have been unable to exhaust your comments on the subject ;) More posts to follow -we will see ;)

Tuesday, 20 March, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am not a fan of him either.
He was one of the biggest murderers of unbelievers in history. Untold numbers were burned at the stake as the result of Calvin and his doctrines.

Peace
Geo

Tuesday, 10 April, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home